Key Differences
In short — Xeon X5650 outperforms Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon X5650 is 196 days newer than Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5650
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Phenom II X4 830 - 168 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5650 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
FPS
165
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€27.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €27.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5650 | vs | AMD Phenom II X4 830 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2009 |
Xeon | Collection | Phenom II X4 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Deneb |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 14.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | No |