Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4690 outperforms Xeon W3520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4690 is 1858 days newer than Xeon W3520.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3520
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Performs up to 5% better in The Last of Us Part I than Xeon W3520 - 133 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Xeon W3520 - 84 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3520 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
133
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€79.81
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €79.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 143 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3520 | vs | Intel Core i5-4690 |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 84 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |