Buy on Amazon
€119.84
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6300 outperforms Xeon W3520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6300 is 2346 days newer than Xeon W3520.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3520
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Performs up to 96% better in Diablo IV than Xeon W3520 - 176 vs 90 FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon W3520 - 51 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3520 doesn't have integrated graphics
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-6300
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
176
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.68/FPS
100%
Price, €
€119.84
100%
FPS and Value Winner
INTEL Core i3-6300 3,8GHz LGA1151 4MB Cache Tray CPU
Buy for €119.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 265 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon W3520
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Core i3-6300
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3520 | vs | Intel Core i3-6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 130 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
