Buy on Amazon
€51.75
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $2999
Availability
MSRP in USD: $2999
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-3175X outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-3175X is 1247 days newer than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3175X
- Performs up to 14% better in Alan Wake 2 than Celeron G3900 - 114 vs 100 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 56 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3175X - 51 vs 255 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-3175X doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
100
87%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€51.75
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3900 2,80GHz Tray CPU
Buy for €51.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 166 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon W-3175X
Server/Workstation • Jan 30th, 2019
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-3175X | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 30th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Xeon W | Collection | Celeron |
| Skylake | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
28 | Cores | 2 |
56 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 255 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
