Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms Xeon E5645 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 3090 days newer than Xeon E5645.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5645
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 80 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 8% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon E5645 - 165 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5645 - 32 vs 12 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Xeon E5645
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5645 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
| Xeon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Colfax |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 16 |
| 12 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
