Buy on Amazon
€124.77
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6300 outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6300 is 1995 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5620
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Performs up to 9% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5620 - 120 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Xeon E5620 - 51 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i3-6300
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
120
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.04/FPS
100%
Price, €
€124.77
100%
FPS and Value Winner
INTEL Core i3-6300 3,8GHz LGA1151 4MB Cache Tray CPU
Buy for €124.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 107 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E5620
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Core i3-6300
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5620 | vs | Intel Core i3-6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 80 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
