Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Xeon E5-2690 vs Core i9-10900F

Xeon E5-2690 vs Core i9-10900F: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Key Differences

In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Xeon E5-2690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2977 days newer than Xeon E5-2690.

Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F

  • Performs up to 12% better in Saints Row than Xeon E5-2690 - 166 vs 148 FPS
  • Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 - 65 vs 135 Watts
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2690 - 20 vs 16 threads
This is a free version of Saints Row.
Saints Row

Saints Row

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Xeon E5-2690 Logo
Xeon E5-2690

Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012


FPS

148

89%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

Intel Core i9-10900F Logo
Core i9-10900F

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020


FPS

166

100%

Value, €/FPS

€1.9/FPS

100%

Price, €

€314.9

100%

FPS and Value Winner

Intel Core i9-10900F (Basistakt: 2,80GHz; Sockel: LGA1200; 65Watt) Box, BX8070110900F

Buy for 314.9 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 18779 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Xeon E5-2690 Logo
Xeon E5-2690

Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012

Intel Core i9-10900F Logo
Core i9-10900F

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Xeon E5-2690 Logo
Xeon E5-2690

Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012


Single-Core

576

34%

Multi-Core

3366

39%

Intel Core i9-10900F Logo
Core i9-10900F

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020


Single-Core

1676

100%

Multi-Core

8426

100%

Intel Xeon E5-2690 Logo

Intel Xeon E5-2690

vs
Intel Core i9-10900F Logo

Intel Core i9-10900F

Mar 6th, 2012Release Date
Apr 30th, 2020
Xeon E5CollectionCore i9
Sandy Bridge-EPCodenameComet Lake
Intel Socket 2011SocketIntel Socket 1200
Server
Segment
Desktop
8Cores
10
16Threads
20
2.9 GHz
Base Clock Speed2.8 GHz
3.8 GHzTurbo Clock Speed
5.2 GHz
135 WTDP
65 W
32 nmProcess Size
14 nm
29.0x
Multiplier28.0x
NoneIntegrated GraphicsNone
NoOverclockableNo

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.