Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2687W outperforms FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2687W is 231 days older than FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2687W
- Performs up to 0% better in Death Stranding than FX-8350 - 215 vs 214 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2687W - 125 vs 150 Watts
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €155.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 124 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2687W | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |