Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms Xeon E5-2680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 2014 days newer than Xeon E5-2680.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 130 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 5% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon E5-2680 - 158 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2680 - 24 vs 16 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Xeon E5-2680
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i9-7920X
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2680 | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 12 |
| 16 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
