Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 1098 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 7% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 131 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 24 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 105 vs 140 Watts
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i9-7920X
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7920X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
