Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Xeon E5-2678 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 6% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-2678 v3 - 124 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 - 65 vs 120 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
124
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
100%
Price, €
€80.73
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €80.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 221 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |