Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Xeon E5-2678 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 7% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Xeon E5-2678 v3 - 192 vs 179 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 - 58 vs 120 Watts
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E5-2678 v3
Server/Workstation
Core i3-12100F
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 120 W | TDP | 58 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
