Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6400 outperforms Xeon E5-2670 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6400 is 297 days newer than Xeon E5-2670 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6400 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Performs up to 0% better in Monster Hunter: World than Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 254 vs 253 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 65 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
254
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€93.84
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €93.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 231 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-6400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |