Buy on Amazon
€87.76
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1589
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1589
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $149
Availability
MSRP in USD: $149
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms Xeon E5-2670 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 1763 days newer than Xeon E5-2670 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 3% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 122 vs 118 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 65 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen 5 3400G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
122
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.72/FPS
100%
Price, €
€87.76
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G 4,2GHz AM4 6MB Cache Wraith Spire
Buy for €87.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 228 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E5-2670 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Ryzen 5 3400G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 120 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
