Buy on Amazon
€20.16
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $2057
Availability
MSRP in USD: $2057
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2667 v3 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2667 v3 is 644 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Performs up to 9% better in Lost Ark than Celeron G1620 - 240 vs 221 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 55 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
221
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1620 CPU Verwendeter 2-Kern-2-Thread-Desktop-Prozessor 2,7 GHz 2M 55W LGA1155
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 135 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
