Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms Xeon E5-2665 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 3530 days newer than Xeon E5-2665.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2665
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 115 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 43% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-2665 - 130 vs 91 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2665 - 24 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2665 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
130
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€467.41
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €467.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2665 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
115 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |