Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Xeon E5-2665 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 3956 days newer than Xeon E5-2665.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2665
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D - 115 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
- Performs up to 46% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Xeon E5-2665 - 158 vs 108 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2665 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
158
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.03/FPS
100%
Price, €
€479
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €479 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2665 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
115 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | No |