Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160T outperforms Xeon E5-2650L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160T is 323 days newer than Xeon E5-2650L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Performs up to 10% better in World of Warcraft than Xeon E5-2650L v2 - 168 vs 153 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2 - 35 vs 70 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2 | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
2.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
70 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |