Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms Xeon E5-2650L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U is 1955 days newer than Xeon E5-2650L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
- Performs up to 2% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Xeon E5-2650L v2 - 210 vs 206 FPS
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2 - 15 vs 70 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2650L v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 2.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 70 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 17.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
