Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900X outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900X is 1502 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900X - 105 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900X
- Performs up to 4% better in World of Tanks than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 536 vs 517 FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
536
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€713.74
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €713.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18684 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 20 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 165 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |