Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms Xeon E5-2643 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 2418 days newer than Xeon E5-2643.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 30% better in Rust than Xeon E5-2643 - 207 vs 159 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2643 - 95 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2643 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2643 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
207
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€21.27
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €21.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2643 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |