Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-9900K outperforms the more expensive Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-9900K is 2146 days newer than the more expensive Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 41% better in Dirt 5 than Celeron G1620 - 194 vs 138 FPS
- Up to 37% cheaper than Celeron G1620 - €12.76 vs €20.16
- Up to 53% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Celeron G1620 - €0.07 vs €0.15 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 55 vs 95 Watts
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
194
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€12.76
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €12.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14152 minutes ago
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14152 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |