Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2433 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 10% better in F1 22 than Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 276 vs 250 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 65 vs 95 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
276
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€91.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €91.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |