Key Differences
In short — Athlon 200GE outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 200GE is 1831 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Performs up to 1% better in Monster Hunter: World than Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 252 vs 250 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
FPS
252
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€100
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 | vs | AMD Athlon 200GE |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Athlon |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | No |