Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100 outperforms Xeon E5-2630 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100 is 2370 days newer than Xeon E5-2630.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100
- Performs up to 6% better in The Last of Us Part I than Xeon E5-2630 - 135 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
135
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€84.15
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €84.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |