Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 927 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - €81.57 vs €101.9
- Up to 17% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-11400F - €0.52 vs €0.63 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 3% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-9100 - 163 vs 158 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100 - 12 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
158
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.57
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3431 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
163
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
82%
Price, €
€101.9
80%
FPS Winner
Buy for €101.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3430 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |