Key Differences
In short — FX-8300 outperforms Xeon E5-2620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8300 is 231 days newer than Xeon E5-2620.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Performs up to 1% better in No Man's Sky than Xeon E5-2620 - 157 vs 156 FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
157
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€73.57
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €73.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 207 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |