Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 1200 outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 1200 is 1053 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1200 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1200
- Performs up to 1% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 99 vs 98 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 65 vs 85 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
99
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€33.03
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €33.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 105 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 1200 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Haswell-E | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |