Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2620 v3 outperforms Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2620 v3 is 1833 days newer than Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Performs up to 15% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Phenom II X4 830 - 118 vs 103 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 85 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Phenom II X4 830
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 | vs | AMD Phenom II X4 830 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2009 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Phenom II X4 |
| Haswell-E | Codename | Deneb |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
85 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 14.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
