Key Differences
In short — FX-6300 outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6300 is 313 days older than Xeon E5-2620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 80 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Performs up to 1% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 115 vs 114 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
115
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€49.68
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €49.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |