Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2609 v3 outperforms FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2609 v3 is 685 days newer than FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3
- Performs up to 3% better in Rust than FX-8350 - 159 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 85 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 8 vs 6 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €155.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 107 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |