Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2609 v3 outperforms FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2609 v3 is 1062 days newer than FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3
- Performs up to 5% better in Starfield than FX-4100 - 45 vs 43 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 85 vs 95 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €20.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 215 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |