Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Xeon E5-2430 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 2610 days newer than Xeon E5-2430.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2430
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 25% better in War Thunder than Xeon E5-2430 - 160 vs 128 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2430 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2430 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
160
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.26
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €69.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2430 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Sandy Bridge-EN | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |