Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2420 outperforms Celeron G530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2420 is 253 days newer than Celeron G530.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2420
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron G530 - 168 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G530 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G530
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2420 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2420 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
165
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 194 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2420 | vs | Intel Celeron G530 |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge-EN | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
2.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |