Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2600S outperforms Xeon E5-2420 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-2600S is 966 days older than Xeon E5-2420 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2600S - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600S
- Performs up to 3% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2420 v2 - 117 vs 114 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
117
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
100%
Price, €
€75.84
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €75.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-2600S |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge EN | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |