Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 2200G outperforms Xeon E5-2420 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 2200G is 1625 days newer than Xeon E5-2420 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Performs up to 16% better in Rust than Xeon E5-2420 v2 - 177 vs 153 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
177
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
100%
Price, €
€80.24
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €80.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Ivy Bridge EN | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |