Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v2 outperforms Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v2 is 1470 days newer than Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2
- Performs up to 3% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Phenom II X4 830 - 151 vs 147 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2 - 95 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
FPS
147
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€27.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €27.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2 | vs | AMD Phenom II X4 830 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2009 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Phenom II X4 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Deneb |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 14.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |