Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Xeon E5-1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2402 days newer than Xeon E5-1620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 18% better in HITMAN 2 than Xeon E5-1620 - 137 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 24 vs 8 threads
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
137
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.92/FPS
100%
Price, €
€399.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |