Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700K outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-14700K is 3326 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700K
- Performs up to 16% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 231 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 28 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
231
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.69/FPS
100%
Price, €
€391.54
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €391.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-14700K |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 20 |
8 | Threads | 28 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |