Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 2696 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 6% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 184 vs 173 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 58 vs 140 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E5-1620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i3-12100F
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 58 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
