Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-8400 is 1123 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 2% better in F1 22 than Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 274 vs 268 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 65 vs 140 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
274
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
100%
Price, €
€177.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €177.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14068 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-8400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |