Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6300 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6300 is 721 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Performs up to 4% better in The Outer Worlds than Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 203 vs 196 FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 51 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
203
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€124.15
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €124.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | Intel Core i3-6300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |