Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms Xeon E3-1535M v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 1647 days newer than Xeon E3-1535M v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 45 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 4% better in Valheim than Xeon E3-1535M v5 - 206 vs 198 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 - 20 vs 8 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
206
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€425.94
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €425.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17984 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Oct 27th, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Oct 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
HD Graphics P530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |