Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1290 v2 outperforms Celeron G530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1290 v2 is 253 days newer than Celeron G530.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2
- Performs up to 26% better in FIFA 23 than Celeron G530 - 111 vs 88 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G530 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G530
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 65 vs 87 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 129 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 | vs | Intel Celeron G530 |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
87 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |