Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1290 v2 outperforms Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1290 v2 is 986 days newer than Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2
- Performs up to 4% better in Elden Ring than Phenom II X4 830 - 113 vs 109 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 87 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
FPS
109
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€27.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €27.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 109 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 | vs | AMD Phenom II X4 830 |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2009 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Phenom II X4 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Deneb |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
87 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 14.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | No |