Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1285L v4 outperforms Core i7-6800K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1285L v4 is 364 days older than Core i7-6800K.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4
- Performs up to 1% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-6800K - 172 vs 170 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
170
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.75/FPS
100%
Price, €
€127.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €127.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15353 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2015
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Broadwell | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel Iris Pro P6300 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |