Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms Xeon E3-1280 v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 1655 days newer than Xeon E3-1280 v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 80 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 5% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E3-1280 v5 - 136 vs 130 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 - 12 vs 8 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
136
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.93/FPS
100%
Price, €
€126.41
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €126.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 166 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |