Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600GT outperforms Xeon E3-1280 v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600GT is 3003 days newer than Xeon E3-1280 v5.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT
- Performs up to 11% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E3-1280 v5 - 143 vs 129 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E3-1280 v5
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Ryzen 5 5600GT
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Skylake | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
