Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1280 v5 outperforms Celeron G530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1280 v5 is 1506 days newer than Celeron G530.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5
- Performs up to 11% better in Escape From Tarkov than Celeron G530 - 206 vs 186 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G530 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G530
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
186
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 | vs | Intel Celeron G530 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |