Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1280 v3 outperforms Ryzen 7 3700U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1280 v3 is 2044 days older than Ryzen 7 3700U.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3
- Performs up to 17% better in FIFA 23 than Ryzen 7 3700U - 145 vs 124 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 - 15 vs 82 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3700U |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Haswell | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
82 W | TDP | 15 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 10 |
No | Overclockable | No |